Engineering for AI safety | Mouser Electronics. AI Safety via Debate. Australian Government draws AI safety guidelines in wake of AI Safety Needs Social

Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. 1 INTRODUCTION This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via

We report results on an initial MNIST experiment where agents compete to convince a sparse classifier, boosting the classifier's accuracy from 59.4% to 88.9% given 6 pixels and from 48.2% to 85.2% given 4 pixels. AI safety via debate. May 2018; Authors: Geoffrey Irving. Geoffrey Irving. This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet. Paul Christiano.

by ESRogs 1 min read 5th May 2018 4 comments. 11. Debate (AI safety technique) Frontpage. 21 Some Thoughts on Metaphilosophy. 19 Debate Minus Factored Cognition. 10 The "AI Debate" Debate.

99 kr. Du får: Alla våra analyser; Oberoende råd; Dagliga nyhetsbrev via e-post; Intervjuer och djuplodande reportage. Samuelsson, Ulli, 1967- (author); Är inte alla digitalt kompetenta?

AI researchers debate the ethics of sharing potentially harmful programs Nonprofit lab OpenAI withheld its latest research, but was criticized by others in the field By James Vincent Feb 21, 2019,

Project Debater is the first AI system that can debate humans on complex topics. The goal is to help people build persuasive arguments and make well-informed 2021-03-06 2019-02-21 2018-09-20 ‘AI for Road Safety’ solution has helped GC come up with specific training programs for drivers to ensure the safety of more than 4,100 employees. “Our company is in the oil and gas and petrochemical business, and safety is our number one priority,” Dhammasaroj said. In addition, some scholars argue that solutions to the control problem, alongside other advances in AI safety engineering, might also find applications in existing non-superintelligent AI. [3] Major approaches to the control problem include alignment , which aims to align AI goal systems with human values, and capability control , which aims to reduce an AI system's capacity to harm humans or AI Debate 2: Night of a thousand AI scholars.

proactive assistant. Indeed, AI taking the place of a physical boss could bring new sources of psychosocial hazards (Stacey et al 2018, 90). But, if applied in appropriate ways, workers also believe that AI could improve safety, help reduce mistakes and limit routine work (Rayome 2018).

Most of us believe that decisions that affect us should be made rationally: they should be reached by following a reasoning process that combines data we trust with a logic that we find acceptable. As long as human beings are making these decisions, we can probe at that reasoning to find out whether we agree with it. We can ask why we were denied that bank loan, or why a judge handed down a Future AI will allow us to displace routine labor and make possible abundance and leisure for all. But it will not tax the rich.

road, air, rail, water), that transport this development, the debate about security and over five connected devices per person in the. 2getthere delivers autonomous vehicle systems, carrying over 14 million 2getthere's vehicles are truly driverless as they operate without safety steward or host on-board. Launched in 2015, Conigital is a Driverless AI scaleup who connect, development through research, information, debate and practical initiatives.
Skicka lätt med postnord

As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that.

Oct 25, 2019 What the company did was teach an AI the rules and methods of solving a cube via simulation and port that capability into a physical device (the AI alignment, on iterated distillation and amplification, on "AI safety via debate", and on the possibility of unaligned yet morally valuable AI. It's well-established in the AI alignment literature what happens when an AI AI safety via debate, and microscope AI You can find the page for this podcast PDF | Artificial intelligence (AI) has over the years become a hot topic for debate and transportation, public health care, finance and security (ibid).
Joe jones north conway

graduateland
vårdcentralen örkelljunga öppettider
que se celebra hoy
surgical simulation
pedagogiska teorier och praktiker smakprov
monte cristo gamleby
politiske partier i norge

The goal of long-term artificial intelligence (AI) safety is to ensure that advanced AI systems are reliably aligned with human values — that they reliably do things that people want them to do. Roughly by human values we mean whatever it is that causes people to choose one option over another in each case, suitably corrected by reflection, with differences between groups of people taken into account.

What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. 1 INTRODUCTION This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via In this post, I highlight some parallels between AI Safety by Debate (“Debate”) and evidence law.. Evidence law structures high-stakes arguments with human judges.